And oh by the way, Dalton isn't even average. He's only slightly above the buttfumble level of play. He should be a back-up.
How many picks did Tanny throw against that huston defence
Wisdom from a "QB Whisperer::
"No we have our FRANCHISE QB and I want to keep him rather than get 2 guys who may or may not be productive NFL players.
Palmer's situation is different and if I had my choice between Palmer and buttfumble, I'd take buttfumble"
Don't hate on Dalton, most of us would kill to have had our QB lead our team into the playoffs back to back years
Yeah being from Ohio I have to root for the Bengals a bit, and I want to like the guy, but from what I've seen he hasnt proven that he can really carry a team when they need him too. Unfortunately I would say the same thing about Tannehill, but I will not start to take points from Tannehill until he shows he cant do it with good talent around him. From what I've seen from both, I prefer Tannehill, when he gets someone that can go get those long bombs, and he becomes comfortable throwing down the middle he is gonna be so much fun to watch. Tannehill I feel has been more accurate and consistent than any QB weve had for a while (except maybe Penny), its the receivers that are inconsistent. Tannehill has shown he can work the sideline VERY well, its those long balls, and intermediate routes down the middle he has struggled with. I would gues a lot of it has to do with confidence in his receivers, our guys havent exactly been stellar catching balls over the middle, and if you dont catch those, its a 50/50 ball up in the air. How many times have we seen a tipped pass across the middle turn into a pick over the last decade? Too many times for me.
"hey atleast I'm housebroken!"