By "stats without context" I assume you mean any and all stats that suggest Sanchez is terrible.
Look, QB rating isnt an end all, be all stat, but you can get a rough idea of where a QB stands in relation to other QBs. QBs that hover in the lower third in QB rating throughout their careers just arent very good. Im guessing QB rating is a fanasy stat though.
Stats w/o context means calling our run game a top run game in 2010 or saying our D was GREAT, sayinf peyton was great against pitt 2005. Smarter fans can dig through the raw #s.
A director of college scouting took himself out of contention for a gm job bc of a pr move?
You cannot seriously believe this.
While this site has a lot of people here you usually see the ones argue with you be the same day in and day out. Everyone in this thread for instance and of course the 30 others daily that involve the Jets. I don't think any of us are dimwit tools when it comes to football.On all sites. Most boards are filled w/ average fans who evaluate based strictly on stats/rankings. One thing I have learned is fans are the same on every board, the only difference is the team we root for. The excuses are the same.