Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456789 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 86

Thread: Salguero: Jake Long wants to get PAID

  1. -51
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    21,176
    vCash:
    25250
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Hydra logo
Gift received at 05-21-2014, 12:20 PM from DisturbedShifty1972 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by DphinBillkiller View Post
    Nobody is in favor of over paying Long, hopefully both sides can see the light of reason and come to agreement.
    If they are in favor of tagging him, they are in favor of overpaying.





    Quote Quote  

  2. -52
    Football Guru

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    9,846
    vCash:
    8791
    Loc:
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Is Long an elite left tackle now? No. Is he the player he was several years ago? No. Does he deserve 10 million per season? NO!!! Let someone else pay him that much!!!
    Please God, let me see 1 Dolphins Superbowl victory before I die.
    Quote Quote  

  3. -53
    Noodleman's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2004
    Posts:
    699
    vCash:
    1060
    Thanks / No Thanks
    My question for those who want him is why pay him money when the last 2 seasons he has ended on IR? I could see giving him money if he was not a HUGE injury risk but the reality is this guy is only going to get worse IMO. THe body doesn't typically get stronger the more you play, it weakens. Armando's comparison to Boselli is spot on. Why resign someone who is an injury risk to play an important role on the team? Let him walk and replace him plain and simple.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -54
    AFCMiamiEast's Avatar
    Longing for Relevancy...

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2012
    Posts:
    1,808
    vCash:
    4327
    Loc:
    Delray Beach, Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Tannehill 171972 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzo View Post
    Fine, even if he played poorly, we still went 4-2 with him at LT. That shows that we can win with him in the position and don't need to draft a RT high and certainly don't need to overpay for Long.
    You're judging this entire scenario over a span of just 6 games? May I also add that while starting at LT in the most recent game at NE, the offense scored ZILCH...against a below average NE defense. I have no faith in Martin right now and he has given me no reason to. There is absolutely no scenario in my mind where I would slap the tag on Long for $15m, not even as a last resort. However, I push extremely hard at bringing him back to a team friendly deal. If not, I am forced to leave Martin at LT and cross my fingers that he shows MASSIVE growth or we're screwed yet again with supplementing one whole while creating another. That is a failed philosophy.
    Last edited by AFCMiamiEast; 01-23-2013 at 09:23 PM.



    "Sometimes when I close my eyes, I can't see."
    Quote Quote  

  5. -55
    finfan54's Avatar
    Finheaven Hall of Fame

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    24,951
    vCash:
    19467
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by DefensiveEnd76 View Post
    Is Long an elite left tackle now? No. Is he the player he was several years ago? No. Does he deserve 10 million per season? NO!!! Let someone else pay him that much!!!
    got his replacement in mind? Because this is what they are juggling. Its easy to be so straightforward on one side of the equation, but then we forget the other side and walla, Marc Columbo. oh yeah, gotta sign Garner. oh yeah, lookin to Yeatman.

    I gotta go look at some Tackles in the draft now....
    Quote Quote  

  6. -56
    allsilverdreams's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    2,524
    vCash:
    2955
    Thanks / No Thanks
    i would love to keep him for 4mill a year for 3 years.other than that i think we over pay.its like going in to the ca dealer and he tells you he wants top dollar for that used car
    Quote Quote  

  7. -57
    roy_miami's Avatar
    Rookies

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2008
    Posts:
    7,340
    vCash:
    33165
    Loc:
    Moncton, NB
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I'm starting to think good o-line play has as much to do with scheming and play calling than having elite players there. Not saying you can get away with having 5 marc columbo's, you need competent players but I don't think you need 5 all pros either.

    I think Martin will be fine at LT. Incogs is probably a goner, he makes too much and doesn't fit the scheme. I'm really curious to see how Jerry handles this offseason, did the new coaching staff get through to him or is he back to eating 100 cheeseburgers a day? Theres a good chance we'll be looking at 3 new faces on the o-line next season.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -58
    madmic21's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2005
    Posts:
    2,337
    vCash:
    4591
    Loc:
    Pueblo West CO
    Thanks / No Thanks
    A lot of you guys need to get over the 15 million dollar tag #. Building a team is not about money it is about managing your cap situation on a year to year basis. I made a post earlier as this being the last possible option of three. The reason teams use the cap and and players hate it is because it is a cap friendly team friendly tool. If the team is not comfortable with the tackle position going into free agency and beyond the tag is a great way to protect yourself. If you have doubts about Jake's health but have concerns about what will happen if he is not here next year you can sign him and attempt to solve the problem for 2014 in the draft, while not causing long term cap issues. Tagging him will cost us cap space in 2013 but there is plenty of room and we need not blow the space on players in 1 year.


    MY FAM
    Quote Quote  

  9. -59
    madmic21's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2005
    Posts:
    2,337
    vCash:
    4591
    Loc:
    Pueblo West CO
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I bet you ask any GM what to do with Jake with these following statements in mind, What to do with Jake Long?
    1. You can't sign Jake for a 3-4 year deal for 8-10 million per year.
    2. Similar talent for same price is not available.
    3. Draft is the draft.
    4. You have 40+ mil in cap space for upcoming season
    5. Have holes at WR, CB, Oline, on your current roster.

    95% of them say tag him.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -60
    roy_miami's Avatar
    Rookies

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2008
    Posts:
    7,340
    vCash:
    33165
    Loc:
    Moncton, NB
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by madmic21 View Post
    I bet you ask any GM what to do with Jake with these following statements in mind, What to do with Jake Long?
    1. You can't sign Jake for a 3-4 year deal for 8-10 million per year.
    2. Similar talent for same price is not available.
    3. Draft is the draft.
    4. You have 40+ mil in cap space for upcoming season
    5. Have holes at WR, CB, Oline, on your current roster.

    95% of them say tag him.
    I would take that bet in a heartbeat.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Jake Long/Kenan Allen vs. Jake Matthews/Mike Wallace
    By madridfinfan in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-02-2012, 10:49 PM
  2. jake long is over paid...
    By MegaFinz in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-04-2012, 04:10 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-20-2010, 12:20 PM
  4. Did we pay TOO much for Jake Long? Highest Paid Linemen in the League?
    By MartinTheSNAKE in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 04-24-2008, 03:02 PM
  5. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 02-27-2008, 08:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •