Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 60

Thread: What rule or penalty would you like gone?

  1. -11
    scodoublet's Avatar
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2003
    Posts:
    636
    vCash:
    3120
    Loc:
    CT FinFan
    Thanks / No Thanks
    So many rules to change, but i agree with many from above.

    - Please get rid of Tuck Rule
    - Forget coaches challenging plays. All plays should be reviewed from refs upstairs somewhere. We have the technology to make reviews quick now-a-days.
    - Put the kickoff back where it was
    - I don't mind the rule about not leading with your head, but the hitting a defenseless receiver call is BS. If a receiver has his hands up to catch the ball, he is going to be defenseless. So what can defenses do? Wait until after he pulls the ball down to hit him?
    A good friend will come and bail you out of jail...but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn...that was fun!"
    Quote Quote  

  2. -12
    EricCartman's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2010
    Posts:
    147
    vCash:
    1597
    Loc:
    Turin, Italy
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I would add how they changed the intentional grounding!!! now all you have to do is going outside of the pocket e get rid of the ball...... once you had to decide in a split second: pass the ball and risking the int or taking the hit&loss yards...
    Buzz Meeks....
    Quote Quote  

  3. -13
    Twitches Brew's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2010
    Posts:
    1,207
    vCash:
    1471
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Cornerbacks 'not turming to look for the ball'.

    I don't know why it matters where his eyes are. If there's some contact and he's looking at the ball: no flag. If he doesn't turn, the ball is underthrown, he jumps to deflect what he thinks is coming, and the WR comes back into him: flag. It's total BS.

    If it's a jump ball, why should the corner have to look at the ball? Why can't he just jump? (It's also how the Ravens get a lot of first downs (so says my Balt fan friend: "our best 3rd-long play, lob to Torrey deep and get PI").)
    Quote Quote  

  4. -14
    SabanHater's Avatar
    ***** in the House!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2007
    Posts:
    7,615
    vCash:
    3386
    Loc:
    South Philadelphia
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Jeff Ireland.

    Oh wait....
    Quote Quote  

  5. -15
    nyashfan's Avatar
    For Earth Below

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    526
    vCash:
    3389
    Loc:
    New York, NY
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I wouldn't mind if pass interference was only a 15 yard penalty, except under 2 minutes in each half at which point it reverts to a spot foul.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -16
    Daytona Fin's Avatar
    FIN4LIFE

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2002
    Posts:
    14,372
    vCash:
    29077
    Loc:
    Daytona Beach
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Cam Wake 91Tannehill 171972 Dolphins Logo2013 Dolphins Logo
    No more ties.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -17
    NorFlaFin's Avatar
    PowerHungryMo'fo

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    3,825
    vCash:
    2787
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Get rid of the elaborate face-masks; you won't lead with your head if you risk crushing your own nose.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -18
    madmic21's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2005
    Posts:
    2,291
    vCash:
    2455
    Loc:
    Pueblo West CO
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I don't like the idea that a DB has to look for the ball to avoid PI. With the back shoulder throw being as effective as it is I don't think a DB needs to look for the ball to play legal defense. He has his back to the throw in trail coverage and the idea of looking for the ball in that situation is stupid and completely makes no sense in terms of the technique they are playing.


    MY FAM
    Quote Quote  

  9. -19
    MadDog 88's Avatar
    Teddy Westside

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    12,969
    vCash:
    24018
    Loc:
    Wichita, Kansas
    Thanks / No Thanks
    nyashfan nailed it.

    As for the big hitting, those days are gone. The Soul Patrol was my favorite secondary and I loved the way they played football. I long for those days but realize that safety HAS to be enforced by the NFL.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -20
    zachblitz54's Avatar
    Juck the Fets

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2006
    Posts:
    1,191
    vCash:
    2979
    Loc:
    Virginia
    Thanks / No Thanks
    2013 Dolphins Logo1972 Dolphins LogoTannehill 17
    The "Protect Tom Brady at all cost" rule.

    Oh yeah, and the half the distance to the goal rule. Move the ball to the one yard line when penalty on defense.

    .....
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. penalty
    By dfin54 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-18-2005, 04:37 PM
  2. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-25-2004, 12:30 PM
  3. Penalty.RUN RUN RUN
    By Denny in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-21-2003, 04:09 PM
  4. Merged 2X: No Penalty For McGinnest?/Taunting Rule
    By Jay2Chambers in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-02-2003, 10:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •