Sure he does, he’s the all powerful FSM.Originally Posted by Statler
Wtf are you talking about? I know what a conclusion & premise are, did you misread my sentence? That syllogism (conclusion included) doesn’t conclusively prove that all electrons repel one another, & your syllogism (conclusion included) doesn’t prove God’s existence. They are both lacking evidence to support their conclusions; ie, they prove nothing.Originally Posted by Statler
You can’t keep saying that there’s nothing in logic that requires one’s premises to be actually verifiable. “A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is both valid, and all of its premises are actually true. Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound.” Your premises aren’t true because you’ve yet to actually demonstrate that God is necessary for knowledge. You’ve just continued claiming that you think all other ways are impossible, without actually proving your own. This is not proof through negation, that is just your unproven theory.Originally Posted by Statler
Do you know how dumb that is? You’re asking someone to disprove the existence of God. You can’t disprove the existence of God for the same reason you can’t prove the existence of God; there is absolutely no proof of his existence or non-existence. Look, I’ll show you how crazy this is:Originally Posted by Statler
If my shoe is red, Aliens must exist
My shoe is red
Therefore Aliens exists
See, you can’t refute any of that, so it obviously must be true. I have provided you just as little evidence that there’s a correlation between my shoe being red & aliens existing as you’ve provided us with proof that God's existence is necessary for knowledge to exist. Nothing more than assertions without any evidence. There are countless things that can't be refuted, but that doesn't necessarily make them true.