Sure he does, heís the all powerful FSM.Originally Posted by Statler
Wtf are you talking about? I know what a conclusion & premise are, did you misread my sentence? That syllogism (conclusion included) doesnít conclusively prove that all electrons repel one another, & your syllogism (conclusion included) doesnít prove Godís existence. They are both lacking evidence to support their conclusions; ie, they prove nothing.Originally Posted by Statler
You canít keep saying that thereís nothing in logic that requires oneís premises to be actually verifiable. ďA deductive argument is sound if and only if it is both valid, and all of its premises are actually true. Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound.Ē Your premises arenít true because youíve yet to actually demonstrate that God is necessary for knowledge. Youíve just continued claiming that you think all other ways are impossible, without actually proving your own. This is not proof through negation, that is just your unproven theory.Originally Posted by Statler
Do you know how dumb that is? Youíre asking someone to disprove the existence of God. You canít disprove the existence of God for the same reason you canít prove the existence of God; there is absolutely no proof of his existence or non-existence. Look, Iíll show you how crazy this is:Originally Posted by Statler
If my shoe is red, Aliens must exist
My shoe is red
Therefore Aliens exists
See, you canít refute any of that, so it obviously must be true. I have provided you just as little evidence that thereís a correlation between my shoe being red & aliens existing as youíve provided us with proof that God's existence is necessary for knowledge to exist. Nothing more than assertions without any evidence. There are countless things that can't be refuted, but that doesn't necessarily make them true.