Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 41

Thread: Need Help... Is Wallace >>> B. Marshall was?

  1. -31
    sirvmac's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    552
    vCash:
    1443
    Loc:
    Chicago
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Czonka39 View Post
    Would appreciate some input.
    Nope not even close. Wallace is a cookie cutter WR. He is physically incapable of 80% of the things a #1 WR is supposed to do.
    Marshall has the tools of a true #1, but he just has mental/consistency/hands issues.
    Wallace will always be stuck in what he can do.
    Pittsburgh played it how it should be played. Draft a guy like Wallace, he over-exceeds his draft position, take advantage of his rookie contact, and then let him walk to another chump team that will overpay for him.
    Meanwhile Pitt has already drafted his replacement and they won't miss Wallace.
    And then we will be stuck with an ''at best #2'' WR for damn near 60 mil or whatever the crazy rumor is.
    Signing Wallace or Jennings will drive us further down the path of mediocrity.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -32
    russianbear's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    903
    vCash:
    3881
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by sirvmac View Post
    Nope not even close. Wallace is a cookie cutter WR. He is physically incapable of 80% of the things a #1 WR is supposed to do.
    Marshall has the tools of a true #1, but he just has mental/consistency/hands issues.
    Wallace will always be stuck in what he can do.
    Pittsburgh played it how it should be played. Draft a guy like Wallace, he over-exceeds his draft position, take advantage of his rookie contact, and then let him walk to another chump team that will overpay for him.
    Meanwhile Pitt has already drafted his replacement and they won't miss Wallace.
    And then we will be stuck with an ''at best #2'' WR for damn near 60 mil or whatever the crazy rumor is.
    Signing Wallace or Jennings will drive us further down the path of mediocrity.
    80% huh? I think you're dis-crediting what Wallace is capable of by about the same %....
    Quote Quote  

  3. -33
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2011
    Posts:
    10
    vCash:
    1081
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Brandon Marshall is way better
    Quote Quote  

  4. -34
    nyjunc's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    28,234
    vCash:
    21013
    Loc:
    New York
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    1
    different types of players, Marshall is a great possession guy, Wallace is a playmaker BUT keep in mind he played w/ a great QB and a ton of weapons in Pitt to take presssure off. In Miami he'd be far and away their best weapon. Can he handle that? I think so but we'll see.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -35
    allsilverdreams's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    2,478
    vCash:
    2622
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by insomnia411 View Post
    To address one thing you said, I think we would have made the playoffs with Marshall last year. He would have opened up so much for Hartline and Bush and he would have made Tannehill's life much easier, specifically in the red zone where we sucked. I am still completely at a loss for why he was dumped like that, I've yet to hear a satisfactory explanation.... And no, "he's not a Joe Philbin guy" is not a good enough explanation
    If Brandon Marshall is not a Joe Philbin guy but Brian Hartline is, then Joe Philbin hates touchdowns and sucks at coach.
    i think BM will start his BS next year with the bears and they will prob send him packing the ollowing year .unless he some how turns into a grown man
    Quote Quote  

  6. -36
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2011
    Posts:
    1,037
    vCash:
    5425
    Loc:
    New York City
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Peoppe need to get over this wallace is limited nonsense, he's not limited anymore.

    On top of that Marshall couldn't dream of stretching the defense the way wallace does. Moss is plenty limited, but what he did was make everything easier for everyone else, while still being productive, thats a rare ability.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -37
    Mogwai's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2006
    Posts:
    4,417
    vCash:
    4945
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I'd take Wallace every time. They are on opposite sides of the spectrum as to what kind of receivers they are. But Marshall has serious, serious character concerns that are detrimental to his value to a team. I don't like his game much either and the constant attention in targets he seems to require along with frequent lapses in concentration. Wallace has that rare gamebreaking ability that completely changes an offense and he's not a ****ing lunatic so he definitely has the edge in this comparison.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -38
    Phinatic8u's Avatar
    FinHeaven's Elite

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2008
    Posts:
    9,268
    vCash:
    8633
    Loc:
    South Carolinia
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Cam Wake 91PS4 Controller2013 Dolphins Logo1972 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by sirvmac View Post
    Nope not even close. Wallace is a cookie cutter WR. He is physically incapable of 80% of the things a #1 WR is supposed to do.
    Marshall has the tools of a true #1, but he just has mental/consistency/hands issues.
    Wallace will always be stuck in what he can do.
    Pittsburgh played it how it should be played. Draft a guy like Wallace, he over-exceeds his draft position, take advantage of his rookie contact, and then let him walk to another chump team that will overpay for him.
    Meanwhile Pitt has already drafted his replacement and they won't miss Wallace.
    And then we will be stuck with an ''at best #2'' WR for damn near 60 mil or whatever the crazy rumor is.
    Signing Wallace or Jennings will drive us further down the path of mediocrity.
    80% huh?

    Anyways you do know Pittsburgh offered Wallace a big contract right? Looking at your post I can bet you didn't.



    Quote Quote  

  9. -39
    JT-forpresident's Avatar
    Believe In Miami

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2007
    Posts:
    4,045
    vCash:
    1019
    Loc:
    canada, Qc
    Thanks / No Thanks
    " Need Help... Is Wallace >>> B. Marshall was ? "



    Welcome to Finheaven, M. Ireland !
    Quote Quote  

  10. -40
    tazthenomad's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2010
    Posts:
    887
    vCash:
    1336
    Loc:
    Daphne, AL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by fanfin View Post
    Greg Jennings> Both
    Please explain. I don't see how you can say Jennings > both statistically. Jennings has been hurt the past few years. Do you think character is that big a differential?
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-18-2013, 07:53 AM
  2. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 03-12-2013, 01:31 PM
  3. Gibson + Welker > Wallace OR Gibson + Cook > Wallace
    By BenchFiedler in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-10-2013, 08:32 PM
  4. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-19-2012, 02:52 PM
  5. The new Marshall Plan: If lockout, Marshall intends to play Basketball
    By FinAtic8480 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-14-2010, 12:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •