Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Draft Winds I: Cordarrelle Patterson

  1. -21
    X-FACTOR's Avatar
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2005
    Posts:
    318
    vCash:
    1619
    Loc:
    WASHINGTON, D.c.
    Thanks / No Thanks
    The one factor that I have not yet highlighted that gives him an amazing edge with the football in his hands is his awareness of the field and defenders. For a guy that does boneheaded things at times that show a lack of mental presence, he shows absolutely amazing mental presence on the run when he is running with the football in his hands. He has eyes in the back of his head. His functional field memory and instincts are off the charts. This was something that Dez Bryant had going for him in a big way coming out of Oklahoma. It was why I loved Dez so much coming out of that Draft. And, it is why Dez Bryant is a special player in the NFL as we sit here today, despite his issues.

    This is the part that gives me great hope for what the dolphins offense could have as a weapon. He appears to be able to run the same routes as Mike Wallace and plus he looks to have little more shiftyness/sizzle. Perhaps with maturity the bonehead mistakes will subside. Then of course CK as if on cue, you brought me back down to earth when you concluded that Ireland and Philbin would never choose a player such as Patterson, because of his slow processing speed (I hate you when you're right). So there is a grain of truth to what Nic Bouniconti said about Jeff's averson to play makers.

    Great write-up.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -22
    ckparrothead's Avatar
    Premium Member

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    47,133
    vCash:
    2719
    Loc:
    Tampa, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by hooshoops View Post
    that may be true but it's the system your 10 year qb has played in his whole high level career pretty much and one the he shows to me at least to excel in...tannehill reads leverage well imo...i'll adjust the talent i surround him with with what i believe plays to his strengths the most...and one thing this o screams to me is you better be able to read coverage and read leverage and adjust on the fly to it...if you play dumb or raw your ass is gone
    If Ryan Tannehill is indeed a "10 year" guy at the quarterback position. He doesn't need an inflexible system or scheme in order to be successful. In fact it's more likely just the opposite. A fluid scheme that takes advantage of talents available would probably help his career more.
    Twitter: @ckparrot
    Quote Quote  

  3. -23
    TedSlimmJr's Avatar
    Hartselle Tigers (15-0) 5-A State Champ

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    8,938
    vCash:
    3051
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by ckparrothead View Post
    At some point when a guy as talented as Cordarrelle Patterson doesn't fit your system, it might be time to look at your system and see what's wrong with it.

    This is essentially the bottom line. If TALENT doesn't fit your system, that system won't be around very long, neither will the guys that implement it. I don't know of any system where talent doesn't fit.

    I'm tempted to dig up all of the threads around here about Demaryius Thomas and how raw he was as a prospect... same with Torrey Smith, Percy Harvin, and Julio Jones. Meanwhile talking about how 'polished' Michael Floyd and Brian Robiskie were.

    Cordarrelle Patterson is nowhere near as raw as some people think. However, I do understand how someone might have an issue with him with the 12th overall pick, because that's the stance I've had from the beginning.. and I had him as the top WR in the draft before anybody that I know of.

    Having an issue with him at #12 is one thing, but to turn around and insinuate that he isn't the top WR prospect in this class, or to make a case for Keenan Allen that high is full of holes... holes they don't even know about.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -24
    hooshoops's Avatar
    Ryan tannehill...like a boss

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    31,585
    vCash:
    27881
    Loc:
    richmond va
    Thanks / No Thanks
    well enlighten me on the holes with keenan allen there slimm???
    hoops scoops 2012 season ..."in 2014 ryan tannehill etches his name in stone amongst the games elite qbs"..."ryan tannehill and andrew luck will carry the afc for the next decade plus the way peyton manning and tom brady have this last decade plus"
    Quote Quote  

  5. -25
    justdev7's Avatar
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    1,916
    vCash:
    1503
    Loc:
    Portland
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Draft Winds I: Cordarrelle Patterson

    As always CK, a great in depth look at a guy that we're all interested in.

    I think Patterson is even more dangerous after the catch than Tavon Austin. I would be more than happy if we took him at 12. If by some grace of god we can trade back with a team like the bears (who I think will look to make a move up for the 3rd tackle whether it be fisher or lane Johnson) I would rather take the trade than Patterson. But that's purely because I think Tyler Eifert NEEDS to be a fin.

    Again, thanks for the great insight. I look forward to the rest I the series. I look forward to hearing your analysis in Justin hunter?
    Quote Quote  

  6. -26
    dolfin530's Avatar
    Student of the Game

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    784
    vCash:
    2277
    Loc:
    SC
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Good stuff CK. Patterson is worth it IMO. He is not near Randy Moss talent but Patterson's build and speed remind me of Moss.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -27
    ckparrothead's Avatar
    Premium Member

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    47,133
    vCash:
    2719
    Loc:
    Tampa, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by TedSlimmJr View Post
    This is essentially the bottom line. If TALENT doesn't fit your system, that system won't be around very long, neither will the guys that implement it. I don't know of any system where talent doesn't fit.

    I'm tempted to dig up all of the threads around here about Demaryius Thomas and how raw he was as a prospect... same with Torrey Smith, Percy Harvin, and Julio Jones. Meanwhile talking about how 'polished' Michael Floyd and Brian Robiskie were.

    Cordarrelle Patterson is nowhere near as raw as some people think. However, I do understand how someone might have an issue with him with the 12th overall pick, because that's the stance I've had from the beginning.. and I had him as the top WR in the draft before anybody that I know of.

    Having an issue with him at #12 is one thing, but to turn around and insinuate that he isn't the top WR prospect in this class, or to make a case for Keenan Allen that high is full of holes... holes they don't even know about.
    That's another point I keep trying to emphasize. You've probably got the best perspective of anyone as I think you're a wide receivers coach but from what I've seen as far as the routes Cordarrelle was asked to run, the ones where he was thrown the ball and caught it...it seemed like a nice wide variety.

    I think he loses his awareness of landmarks and I think he might have some trouble reading leverage on the fly at the moment but you'd hope those things will get better.

    I don't remember making raw/polished arguments about the likes of Torrey Smith, Percy Harvin, Julio Jones or Michael Floyd. I do remember loving Demaryius Thomas despite accusations of being raw. But I also really liked Stephen Hill out of the same system despite obvious questions of being raw. Still like him. I also remember really not liking the whole Brian Robiskie cult following much at all.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -28
    Roman529's Avatar
    Moon Runner / The 3 AM Crew

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2004
    Posts:
    33,628
    vCash:
    10555
    Loc:
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Nice job CK. I was looking at how you worked out a trade so we could also get the 22nd pick in the first round....I would love for this to happen but it is pretty rare for these many picks to go be exchanged all at one time. I think if we are set at taking a Wide Receiver with our 12th pick, and Patterson is gone, we probably could look at trading down 5 to 10 spots and acquiring another second rounder. The draft is stock full of very good wide receivers....I agree with Mel Kiper that Patterson might be the only WR worth taking at #12, but you have to ask whether there are some other WR's who could provide us with the tall, fast, great hands wide receiver we are looking for. I think Keenan Allen, DeAndre Hopkins, Justin Hunter, Da'Rick Rogers, Terrance Williams, Robert Woods and Quinton Patton all could foot that bill....you also have two under 6 foot WR's in Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey of West Virginia who have great speed, hands, but just are a little small to be a #1, but they could help us as a #2 or #3.

    I think if we go with a defensive player like Dion Jordan, Bjorn Woerner, Zeke Ansah or Sheldon Richardson we could still get a great Wide Receiver in the 40's (second round), or even with our 2B pick. Hopefully Ireland can put the pieces to the puzzle together after free agency begins. Can't wait.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -29
    Dogbone34's Avatar
    cowboy surfer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    2,715
    vCash:
    2239
    Loc:
    Los Angeles
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Love the DW series with CK taking the lead.

    I think Patterson could still be in the mix at #12. Keenan Allen could move way up with a strong pro day.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -30
    ckparrothead's Avatar
    Premium Member

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2002
    Posts:
    47,133
    vCash:
    2719
    Loc:
    Tampa, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    2
    A point that I have made in the past is that when you've got a guy that stands out as a real 1st tier wide receiver and then kind of a whole group of 2nd tier guys...judging by history, you might be better off going with that 1st tier guy, the guy that kind of separates from the pack a little bit.

    Statistically speaking, that group of players that all look fantastic aren't all going to work out. You could have a situation like in 2008 when you had 10 receivers all go in the 2nd round. None of them stood out from one another. None was above the pack. You know how many of those guys ended up being worth anything? Just two...Jordy Nelson and DeSean Jackson. The others were Donnie Avery, Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly, Jerome Simpson, James Hardy, Eddie Royal, Limas Sweed and Dexter Jackson.

    To me back in 2010, Dez Bryant, Mike Williams and Demaryius Thomas really stood out from the group of wide receivers from a talent perspective. They were the guys I had 1st round grades on from a talent perspective. Williams obviously had character issues that needed to be considered and ultimately dropped him on my board, but I considered him the 2nd best talent in that Draft at that position. After that you kind of had a group of guys. If you were lucky, when you participated in that group you ended up taking Eric Decker or Golden Tate. If you were not so lucky, you took Rejus Benn, Damian Williams, Brandon LaFell, Emmanuel Sanders, Jordan Shipley, Andre Roberts, Armanti Edwards or Taylor Price. Very hit or miss.

    Back in 2007 there was no argument about Calvin Johnson. He was head and shoulders above everyone else. The next group though, were kind of jumbled together. I liked Ted Ginn, I'm man enough to admit that mistake. But guys like Dwayne Bowe, Robert Meachem, Craig Davis, Steve Smith, Dwayne Jarrett, Anthony Gonzalez and Sidney Rice were not considered far off that mark. If you were lucky you took Bowe or Rice...or to some degree Smith. If you weren't, you took Ginn, Meachem, Davis, Jarrett or Gonzalez.

    Very similar FOR ME back in 2006. I say for me because even though Chad Jackson was very commonly considered right up there with Santonio Holmes, I didn't think he was even close. I thought the top tier consisted of one man, Holmes. From there, again, you had a cluster. If you were lucky, you took Greg Jennings from that cluster. Or Devin Hester though I didn't really consider him part of that cluster because I had him as special teams only. If you were not so lucky, you took Chad Jackson, Sinorice Moss, Travis Wilson, Derek Hagan, Willie Reid, Brandon Williams or Maurice Stovall.

    Back in 2011, I don't think there's any question A.J. Green and Julio Jones together constituted their own tier. Probably about 12 months prior to that draft I thought Jon Baldwin easily in that tier but by draft day I knew that was not the case. With respect to that next tier, if you were lucky you took Torrey Smith or Randall Cobb. So far, it looks like if you were unlucky you took Jon Baldwin, Titus Young, Greg Little, Austin Pettis, Leonard Hankerson or Jerrel Jernigan.

    The one year that really seems to defy this...is 2009. I think there wasn't any question out in public that Michael Crabtree stood alone that year as a top tier. And he has turned out somewhat deserving of that praise from a talent and production standpoint. Especially this year. They don't win the Super Bowl without him being ridiculous. For me Hakeem Nicks was also in that tier though. I didn't think anyone else aside from Crabtree was on his level, and I wanted to put him in the same tier as Crabtree. But there was a cluster after that. Yet, Maclin, Harvin and Britt have all been pretty good though obviously two of them very troubled character wise. I never really considered Robiskie and Massaquoi to be part of the real 2nd tier with them. That's an example of a "next best" group that actually is pretty talented.

    So anyway back to the original point...when a guy like Cordarrelle Patterson pretty much stands out head and shoulders above the kind of cluster we're seeing with the likes of Stedman Bailey, Markus Wheaton, Quinton Patton, Keenan Allen, Justin Hunter, Robert Woods, Tavon Austin, DeAndre Hopkins and Terrance Williams....you know what, you're better off plumping for the top tier guy...because much as I like most of those players in that next tier, the chances are bad that MOST of them are going to pan out. In fact the chances are good that maybe 3 of the 9 turn out to be any good. Bless you if you took one of those 3...and god help you if you took one of the other 6.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Cordarrelle Patterson: Our Changes...
    By A&O in forum NFL Draft Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-05-2013, 10:32 PM
  2. Cordarrelle Patterson Combine Interview
    By JC in forum NFL Draft Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-25-2013, 02:07 PM
  3. Cordarrelle Patterson - Perspective
    By Digital in forum NFL Draft Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-31-2013, 01:30 AM
  4. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 01-19-2013, 06:46 PM
  5. Cordarrelle Patterson declares for draft
    By uk_dolfan in forum NFL Draft Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 01-11-2013, 11:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •