Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 62

Thread: Jets working out David Garrard

  1. -21
    WVDolphan's Avatar
    Two Little Debbies and a cup of coffee

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    14,774
    vCash:
    12055
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Mike Wallace 112013 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by nyjunc View Post
    What's wrong w/ Garrard? he was going to be your starter last year. He's a decent backup candidate.
    He's a decent candidate to be your backup car driver or 2nd gunman if you were pulling a bank heist.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -22
    J. David Wannyheimer's Avatar
    Why did it have to be snakes?

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    14,910
    vCash:
    73370
    Thanks / No Thanks
    1972 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by WVDolphan View Post
    He's a decent candidate to be your backup car driver or 2nd gunman if you were pulling a bank heist.
    Lmao.

    I'm sure he will show the Jets just enough to fund another year of wakeboarding.
    "Society became divided into camps in which no man trusted his fellow. To put an end to this, there was neither promise to be depended upon, nor oath that could command respect; but all parties dwelling rather in their calculation upon the hopelessness of a permanent state of things, were more intent upon self-defence than capable of confidence." - Thucydides, probably predicting the rise of internet message boards
    Quote Quote  

  3. -23
    Nublar7's Avatar
    FinHeaven Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2003
    Posts:
    35,134
    vCash:
    129289
    Loc:
    120 mi west of Costa Rica
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Jurassic World2013 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by nyjunc View Post
    What's wrong w/ Garrard? he was going to be your starter last year. He's a decent backup candidate.
    Garrard was the "starter" two weeks into training camp and before any of the four preseason games were played. Doesn't mean that he was definitely going to be the Week 1 starter in the regular season. Tannehill was 3rd on the depth chart when Garrard got hurt, but over the next four weeks worked his way into the starting role. It is very likely that Tannehill would have passed Garrard if he was still healthy.

    There is no guarantee he will start in New York, but he might be the best option in relation to Sanchez.

    Quote Quote  

  4. -24
    nyjunc's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    28,535
    vCash:
    22168
    Loc:
    New York
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Nublar7 View Post
    Garrard was the "starter" two weeks into training camp and before any of the four preseason games were played. Doesn't mean that he was definitely going to be the Week 1 starter in the regular season. Tannehill was 3rd on the depth chart when Garrard got hurt, but over the next four weeks worked his way into the starting role. It is very likely that Tannehill would have passed Garrard if he was still healthy.

    There is no guarantee he will start in New York, but he might be the best option in relation to Sanchez.
    Garrard was starting for you and mark will easily beat out him out if we sign him.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -25
    uk_dolfan's Avatar
    Super Donator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2012
    Posts:
    7,080
    vCash:
    16065
    Loc:
    Northern Ireland, UK
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Galactic Empire medalManchester United FCPS4 ControllerCam Wake 912013 Dolphins Logo

    Re: Jets working out David Garrard

    Quote Originally Posted by nyjunc View Post
    Garrard was starting for you and mark will easily beat out him out if we sign him.
    For one preseason game. Thats fact not opinion, he topped the chart for one game he was not the starter.

    The idea if Sanchez easily beating out any QB is rather amusing. Are you the only Jets fan who still supports Sanchez? Serious question.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -26
    MadDog 88's Avatar
    Teddy Westside

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    13,085
    vCash:
    27960
    Loc:
    Wichita, Kansas
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by nyjunc View Post
    Garrard was starting for you and mark will easily beat out him out if we sign him.
    Garrard was the starter based on..........?

    Unlike how the Jets proclaimed Sanchez their starter before he even took a preseason snap his rookie year, the Dolphins never named a starter last season until week 3 of the pre season. Tannehill's play improved markedly from the first day of camp and he passed Matt Moore to win the job. I think it is a safe assumption that Garrard would have been cut because he was not going to start.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -27
    Vaark's Avatar
    InRegioneCaecorum RexEstLusces

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    20,297
    vCash:
    16070
    Loc:
    Zombieland (lookn4 Myles)
    Thanks / No Thanks
    If a healthy Garrard could beat out Moore (a notoriously slow TC'er) who presently just happens to be the 3rd best divisional QB - for anyone who doesn't think he could beat out* The Buttfumbler in a fair competition, I've got a shiny bridge in B'klyn, I can sell you cheap!

    *a competition where an in-over-his-head offensively clueless (in every meaning of the word) lame duck HC with a tat of Buttchez's jersey on his arm gets overruled by Morningwood and Itzdick - 2 seemingly more grounded and objective football guys.





    Quote Quote  

  8. -28
    nyjunc's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    28,535
    vCash:
    22168
    Loc:
    New York
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by uk_dolfan View Post
    For one preseason game. Thats fact not opinion, he topped the chart for one game he was not the starter.

    The idea if Sanchez easily beating out any QB is rather amusing. Are you the only Jets fan who still supports Sanchez? Serious question.
    He was going to be your starter.

    mark would beat out all of the guys mentioned as possible candidates- Moore, Garrard, Quinn, Campbell, ... all things would be equal, he wouldn't be throwing to Chaz Schilens while another QB is throwing to and handing off to better talent.

    Quote Originally Posted by MadDog 88 View Post
    Garrard was the starter based on..........?

    Unlike how the Jets proclaimed Sanchez their starter before he even took a preseason snap his rookie year, the Dolphins never named a starter last season until week 3 of the pre season. Tannehill's play improved markedly from the first day of camp and he passed Matt Moore to win the job. I think it is a safe assumption that Garrard would have been cut because he was not going to start.
    based on every report out of Miami.

    Actually, Mark wasn't officialy named the starter until week 3 of preseason in 2009.

    Tannehill didn't do anything, they were more underwhelmed w/ Matt Moore.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -29
    Vaark's Avatar
    InRegioneCaecorum RexEstLusces

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    20,297
    vCash:
    16070
    Loc:
    Zombieland (lookn4 Myles)
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Sanchez didn't do anything in preseason...yet they were more underwhelmed by Tebow... yet he still started cause they traded away Stanton. Go figure
    Quote Quote  

  10. -30
    MadDog 88's Avatar
    Teddy Westside

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    13,085
    vCash:
    27960
    Loc:
    Wichita, Kansas
    Thanks / No Thanks

    News2

    Quote Originally Posted by nyjunc View Post
    He was going to be your starter.mark would beat out all of the guys mentioned as possible candidates- Moore, Garrard, Quinn, Campbell, ... all things would be equal, he wouldn't be throwing to Chaz Schilens while another QB is throwing to and handing off to better talent.based on every report out of Miami.Actually, Mark wasn't officialy named the starter until week 3 of preseason in 2009.Tannehill didn't do anything, they were more underwhelmed w/ Matt Moore.
    The first team snaps were shared and it was declared an open competition prior to and during camp. Garrard got hurt on Aug 11 knocking him out and it was between Moore and Tannehill. Tannehill was named starter on 21 Aug. Sanchez took snaps with the first teamers in PS games 1 and 2 then was officially announced after practice on 26 Aug prior to game 3.

    Nifty little play on words that Tannehill was given the job because of a lack of competition yet you will try and tell me how Sanchez won the job instead of reminding everyone his competition was Kellen Clemens, Erik Ainge, and Chris Pizzotti. How impressive is that level of competition? Talk about a coaching staff being underwhelmed.

    I should have known better then to try and have an objective conversation with you because you still continue to try and paint pictures to fit your agenda instead of engaging in an intelligent and unbiased dialogue.

    Go ahead and take a stab with the last word.
    Last edited by MadDog 88; 03-06-2013 at 06:56 AM.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. David Garrard Signs with Jets
    By foozool13 in forum Beasts of the AFC East
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-12-2013, 11:08 AM
  2. David Garrard
    By gdiaz0358 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 09-09-2011, 02:26 PM
  3. Why not David Garrard?
    By ClemsonDolphinS in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-12-2006, 01:54 PM
  4. David Garrard?
    By Thebignate5 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-07-2005, 12:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •