Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 51

Thread: Now that Starks is tagged I think we need to move Odrick to a 3-4 team

  1. -1
    phinatic1399's Avatar
    Diehard Phinatic!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2008
    Posts:
    2,896
    vCash:
    197
    Loc:
    Syracuse, NY
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Now that Starks is tagged I think we need to move Odrick to a 3-4 team

    I though all along that if Starks was allowed to walk then we could easily kick Odrick inside to replace him. But now that starks has been tagged I think our best bet would be to see if we can find an interested team that runs a 3-4 and maybe we can get a 3rd-5th round pick for odrick. Then we can maybe sign a true 4-3 DE or draft one like dion jordan or something. What u guys think?
    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    MiamiDolphin618's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    1,362
    vCash:
    3480
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I think they will just leave him at 4-3 DE where he was last year and look to add a 3rd down pass rush specialist. He will probably kick inside on passing downs as well. Thats what I would do. Starks and Big Paul are both going to be FA next year as of now so keeping Odrick around is pretty important IMO.
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    League Dominator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    4,916
    vCash:
    5661
    Loc:
    St. Pete Beach, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    If somehow we could get Dion Jordan or Mingo I'm all for it, but I don't think it will happen. Furthermore, I don't understand why some ppl want Werner at 12 when his skill set is exetremely similiar to Odrick's. But if Odrick loses all that weight, he may become a little more explosive.
    Jets suck, Bills suck, Patriots suck.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2010
    Posts:
    2,548
    vCash:
    8295
    Loc:
    Jersey
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Dolphins Homer1972 Dolphins Logo2013 Dolphins Logo
    No, tagging Starks means that the team wants to keep the strong defensive line together. We had one of the top front fours in the league last year, why break up a good thing? I think we need to add another player to the mix not take one away.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    Fin Thirteen's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2010
    Posts:
    2,373
    vCash:
    8108
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I would shop Big Paul for a 2013 second- and a 2014 third-rounder. He's at his max potential value and a FA next season. Someone like Minny would pull the trigger, I bet.

    If we don't, it raises certain questions for me about the FO's faith in Odrick.
    Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. - S. Beckett
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    hooshoops's Avatar
    Ryan tannehill...like a boss

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    33,873
    vCash:
    43708
    Loc:
    richmond va
    Thanks / No Thanks
    i seriously doubt you'd get that kind of compensation for paul solia...more likely a single 3rd rounder...not even sure you'd get a 2...

    doesn't offer enough pass rush and isn't thought of as on the vince wilfork level around the league...
    hoops scoops 2012 season ..."in 2014 ryan tannehill etches his name in stone amongst the games elite qbs"..."ryan tannehill and andrew luck will carry the afc for the next decade plus the way peyton manning and tom brady have this last decade plus"
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    phinatic1399's Avatar
    Diehard Phinatic!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2008
    Posts:
    2,896
    vCash:
    197
    Loc:
    Syracuse, NY
    Thanks / No Thanks
    No, tagging Starks means that the team wants to keep the strong defensive line together. We had one of the top front fours in the league last year, why break up a good thing? I think we need to add another player to the mix not take one away.
    we need more of a pass rush coming from odricks side.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    Hayden Fox's Avatar
    At the end of the day...

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2009
    Posts:
    23,325
    vCash:
    58255
    Thanks / No Thanks
    1972 Dolphins LogoMike Wallace 11Cam Wake 91Tannehill 17Dolphin
    Nah. Keep him.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    phinatic1399's Avatar
    Diehard Phinatic!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2008
    Posts:
    2,896
    vCash:
    197
    Loc:
    Syracuse, NY
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Nah. Keep him.
    for what though? he ranked as one of the worst DE's by pff last year, we desperately need pass rush on that other side.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    hooshoops's Avatar
    Ryan tannehill...like a boss

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    33,873
    vCash:
    43708
    Loc:
    richmond va
    Thanks / No Thanks
    odrick is depth in case u lose solia and or starks next year...makes no sense to trade him right now...and you wouldn't get any real bang for your buck if you did so now anyways...if anything you'd be selling low...
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Starks NOT Tagged
    By MadDog 88 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-04-2013, 06:55 PM
  2. MERGED: Starks might get tagged
    By bdmagnum in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 03-04-2013, 11:33 AM
  3. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-25-2013, 02:46 AM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-19-2013, 11:11 AM
  5. Let Starks walk, move Odrick inside, sign or draft pass rushing DE
    By phinatic1399 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: 12-12-2012, 02:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •