Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 68

Thread: Why is nobody talking about Matt Moore?

  1. -21
    MadDog 88's Avatar
    Teddy Westside

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    12,809
    vCash:
    9154
    Loc:
    Wichita, Kansas
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by dlockz View Post
    TO be fair dolphin fans do the same with Ponder and Locker even though they look like promising qb's also. hell in actuality Blain Gabbert looks like he has promise.

    Another example is how people act like Tannehill played so much better than Weeden even though they played pretty damn similar. My main problem with Weeden was lack of development time
    Ponder, Locker, Weeden, Wilson and Gabbert are not even close to Tannehill's ability with pre snap adjustments. Luck and Tannehill are by far the best of the young QBs that do this. I am not trying to minimize Wilson and RGIII but give Tannehill the Seahawks defense, WRs and running game and Tannehill is battling Luck for ROY.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -22
    NJPHINFAN79's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2009
    Posts:
    630
    vCash:
    2656
    Loc:
    Jersey
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by dlockz View Post
    TO be fair dolphin fans do the same with Ponder and Locker even though they look like promising qb's also. hell in actuality Blain Gabbert looks like he has promise.

    Another example is how people act like Tannehill played so much better than Weeden even though they played pretty damn similar. My main problem with Weeden was lack of development time
    I agree w ponder and locker although I think thill is better, but I do see them being bashed early in career. Not from me FYI. But gabbert is not going to pan out just IMO . The problem w comparing thill to luck rg3 and Wilson and weeded for that matter is he only played 16 games at QB and is still holding his own as a rookie with limited ( very limited) weapons in his rookie nfl season.
    Quote Quote  

  3. -23
    dlockz's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    32,189
    vCash:
    28325
    Loc:
    Tampa Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by MadDog 88 View Post
    Ponder, Locker, Weeden, Wilson and Gabbert are not even close to Tannehill's ability with pre snap adjustments. Luck and Tannehill are by far the best of the young QBs that do this. I am not trying to minimize Wilson and RGIII but give Tannehill the Seahawks defense, WRs and running game and Tannehill is battling Luck for ROY.

    Why would he battle Luck for rookie of the year when RG3 was rookie of the year
    When Death Smiles Upon You the Infantryman smiles back
    Quote Quote  

  4. -24
    NJPHINFAN79's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2009
    Posts:
    630
    vCash:
    2656
    Loc:
    Jersey
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by defiant View Post
    Tannehills rookie year is virtiually indistinguishable from Chad Henne's first year starting. Enough said, really.

    Only someone with limited thinking ability would compare a 16 game college starter to 4 year player who sat for a year in the nfl. Or ur just a troll and I think it's actually both enough said
    Quote Quote  

  5. -25
    League Dominator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    4,764
    vCash:
    4471
    Loc:
    St. Pete Beach, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by dlockz View Post
    I dont think thats fair. He did play well and thats not unexpected of a rookie qb. He still played well( well for a rookie)
    Rg3 and Wilson were way ahead of anyone else but thats year one
    RG3 and Wilson have much better supporting casts as well. Power running games, seam threat TE's and better WR cores.
    Jets suck, Bills suck, Patriots suck.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -26
    mega-fin-love's Avatar
    Just trust me

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2010
    Posts:
    2,033
    vCash:
    4253
    Loc:
    Centreville Virginia
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Crucify me if you want but I still think Moore is better than Tanny as of this moment. Not saying Tanny can't/wont be better....As of now Moore has shown welll.......more.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -27
    Twitches Brew's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2010
    Posts:
    1,206
    vCash:
    1465
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by defiant View Post
    Have you noticed on every national program that covers the NFL they talk of 3 stellar rookie QBs instead of 4?
    This past season was an exception. Even during the draft last year they talked about how great the QB class was. Luck was pro-ready and took a sorry roster to the playoffs, Washington and Morris did wonders with that system for RG3, and I bet Wilson ends up being better than both of them.

    Tanny has, without a doubt, played well enough to be the clear-cut starter going into 2013.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -28
    MadDog 88's Avatar
    Teddy Westside

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    12,809
    vCash:
    9154
    Loc:
    Wichita, Kansas
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by dlockz View Post
    Why would he battle Luck for rookie of the year when RG3 was rookie of the year
    You get my point. Tannehill had Brian Hartline as his #1, Fasano as his main TE and still managed 12 TDs against 13 Int's. His pre snap adjustments, pocket awareness and pocket presence are superior to RGIII and Wilson who run as soon as the pressure is on. Tannehill threw numerous first down and several TDs after audibiling out of the called play. Numerous analysts have set the celing very high for him.

    This thread is absolutely ridiculous.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -29
    dlockz's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    32,189
    vCash:
    28325
    Loc:
    Tampa Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by SQuinn17 View Post
    RG3 and Wilson have much better supporting casts as well. Power running games, seam threat TE's and better WR cores.
    Funny how people want to act like RG3 has such a great cast. Yea its better than Phins but his season was amazing and I dont see any qb doing better than him with the weapons he had.

    I mean cant we all agree that tannehill did fine lets not try to dismiss qb's that did much better. I dont think Tannehill would have did better than these guys in same situation, this is not saying tannehill will not be good
    Quote Quote  

  10. -30
    Vaark's Avatar
    InRegioneCaecorum RexEstLusces

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    20,026
    vCash:
    13376
    Loc:
    Zombieland (lookn4 Myles)
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by defiant View Post
    Tannehills rookie year is virtiually indistinguishable from Chad Henne's first year starting. Enough said, really.
    But in several ways, better than the rook years of either Elway or PManning (and with Manning having Faulk, Wayne and a reliable kicker at that). Aside from that, if my memory serves me, after the first year, most on here were still bullish on Henne.

    /more_than_enough_said_really




    ANNOUNCING a new FH smiley. Use it judiciously and selectively as to not diminish its impact!



    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-27-2012, 06:58 PM
  2. Matt Ryan or Matt Moore?
    By dolpns13 in forum Fantasy Sports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-01-2012, 07:19 AM
  3. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 03-19-2012, 05:59 PM
  4. Matt Flynn Vs Matt Moore thread
    By mia4ever in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 01-02-2012, 01:42 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-08-2011, 03:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •