But when the trumpets blew again and the knights charged, the name they cried was, "Stannis! Stannis! Stannis!"
It'll be interesting to see what they can get for him.
Wow this thread was epic, and pointless.
The OP has his own definition of "playmaker" and a stat that validates that definition. No other stats are going to be able to refute that definition and the guy makes a thread about it. Ok, good for him. Who cares? It's trolling at it's finest. It all boils down to the definition of "playmaker" and the OP has his own definition that just happens to not fit any of our definitions or even be based in any kind of football reality. The definition of playmaker is the real argument of this thread but the OP just wants to argue whether or not Bess is a "playmaker" by his narrow definition of one. This thread was going to be like beating your head against the wall from the very first post.
And tyler fell for it hook, line, and sinker! Hey tyler, do you have an imaginary girlfriend that lives on the other side of the country too?
Insert pithy saying here.
Disclaimer: The above post, although likely informed by statistics, represents merely the humble opinion of one person, whose opinion is not intended to be presented as having any greater positive quality than anyone else's. The post is not intended to convince other people to think or believe something. Other people's thoughts and beliefs are fully and firmly under their own control, and they should enjoy the freedom to which they're entitled of thinking and believing whatever they prefer.
WV, a bum? That's a little rough. I don't believe you mean that. If you do watch the last quarter of our win over the Seahawks and see whos will to win stands out. See how Tannehill to Bess in the end wins the game for us. Bess is a top 10 slot reciever imo.