Junc will be defending buttfumble to the bitter end... It is kind of sad to see this level of delusion.
I think Junc just needs a little more time to realize what type of QB Mark really is. It's been fun reading his post on how Mark is a better QB than Eli, and then seeing Eli win the Super Bowl in 2011 while Mark went 8-8 with 26 turnovers. Then reading how Mark is a better QB than Joe Flacco, then seeing Flacco win the Super Bowl while Mark went 6-10 with 26 turnovers. He could be 3 for 3 if Ryan wins the Super Bowl next year.
Thanks for leaving behind a legacy of inconsistent performance, setting the Gold standard for
mediocre coaching & piss-poor GM decision-making before stealing away like a thief in the nite!
Of course it's important when The Buttfumbler's play may put his team in a hole, so long as he brought or almost brought them back - but unimportant when he gives them a lead in the second qtr yet loses because he disappears thereafter.
Put mark on NYG '11 or Bal '12 and the teams still win the SB. The Giants won w/ defense and Baltimore had so many weapons you or I could have QB'd them to a SB.
Flacco was being run out of town a month before the SB. Eli and Flacco are good QBs, nothing special.
Put Matt Moore on the 09Jets and they may have actually scored more than 7 pts at home to beat Atlanta in game 14 and beat a dead Cinci team even if their starters were in and trying for the full game for a legitimate winning record. Put Matt on the '10 team and they may have even made it to their only more than 2 post season games post merger SB appearance. Hell, probably could say the same about Rex Grossman
Matt Moore on 2009 Jets and we probably finish 6-10/7-9. Matt is a "good" QB on bad teams.
vs buttfumble who is an equal opportunity QB: bad on both good and bad teams.