Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now

View Poll Results: Which player of the 3 would you be most intrigued if drafted? If not, explain other.

Voters
108. You may not vote on this poll
  • Trade up for CB Dee Milliner (Swap of 1sts and one 2nd rounder)

    13 12.04%
  • Trade up for OT Lane Johnson (Swap of 1sts and one 2nd rounder)

    14 12.96%
  • Draft WR Tavon Austin at 12

    32 29.63%
  • Other

    49 45.37%
Page 1 of 7 123456 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 64

Thread: Which draft scenario is most appealing to you?

  1. -1
    AFCMiamiEast's Avatar
    Who pissed in your kool aide?

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2012
    Posts:
    1,728
    vCash:
    1883
    Loc:
    Delray Beach, Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Tannehill 171972 Dolphins Logo

    Which draft scenario is most appealing to you?

    Teams picking inside the top 8 are not going to be interested in finding a trade partner picking outside the top 15. The Miami Dolphins are sitting pretty with the 12 selection, and have an enticing pick that teams inside the top 8 would be intrigued to swap for in a situation where Miami would trade up for a BPA. I can see us drafting one of two exceptional players in a situation where we trade up. Let's get to the three draft options that sound the most appealing to me:

    1) Trade up and swap our 12th pick for a top 7 pick, as well as trading one of our 2nds and possibly a 4th to gain CB Dee Milliner.

    2) Trade up and swap our 12 pick for a top 7 pick, as well as trading one of our 2nds and possibly a 4th to gain OT Lane Johnson.

    3) Last, and definitely not least, stay put at the 12th selection and draft Tavon Austin.


    The LT position is arguably this team's biggest need going into the draft, but there is a troublesome statistic that may deter the average fan from being on board with yet another 1st round OL selection. This team is currently recovering from a franchise worst, 4 consecutive losing seasons. Under these four seasons, the team has drafted an offensive linemen 1st overall, 15th overall, 42nd overall, and in the 3rd round. You can blame past coaching staffs for the lack of success on the line after such high investments, or you can devalue the offensive line has a whole, and make the argument that the team is more devoid of play making talent at WR and CB.

    However, here is what Mike Mayock had to say of Lane Johnson while at the combine:
    Oklahoma T Lane Johnson had the "freakiest Combine in the history of our coverage," according to NFL Network's Mike Mayock.

    Measuring in at 6'6/303 pounds, Johnson ran a 4.72 "official" forty while also recording a 34 inch vertical, 118 inch broad jump, 7.31 three cone, and 28 bench press reps.
    Lane Johnson is an exact fit for the athletic linemen that coach Phlibin is looking for to fit in his ZBS. With the new talent at receiver and tight end brought in through free agency, Tannehill will possibly be facing even more of a set back from his offensive linemen this year than last, and will need a capable OL to have plays downfield develop. OT Lane Johnson is a viable option for Miami to trade up for.

    Alabama's Dee Milliner is also a very intriguing option. The popular consensus seems to have Miami drafting FSU's Xavier Rhodes at 12. I would be far from pleased if that plan materialized, and believe trading up for the more explosive player in Milliner is a much more thorough strategy. Pairing him up with one of the best DBs in the league in Brent Grimes (hoping he sees a 100% recovery), could prove deadly for opposing offenses. The Miami Dolphins secondary would feature a very exceptional group of players in Dee Milliner, Brent Grimes, Reshad Jones, and Chris Clemons.

    Most corners in this draft would not be expected to become the shutdown corner teams are looking for year 1, but Dee Milliner is as NFL ready as they come. Any pick taken inside the top 10 should be expected to make big contributions as a starter in his rookie season. There is nothing about Dee Milliner that leads me to believe otherwise.

    Last, but certainly not least is the option of sitting still at pick #12 and drafting Tavon Austin, arguably the most explosive, and athletic player in this draft. Period. It's widely accepted around the league that Mike Wallace is the most elite, burner WR in the game today. Tavon Austin proved that he can be just as fast, if not even faster than Mike Wallace throughout his collegiate career and the NFL combine. He ran the best 40 yard dash out of any receiver in the draft, and by significant margin. Adding world class speed to the offense would benefit 2nd year QB Ryan Tannehill tremendously in deep ball situations, as he was already one of the league's best last season with Brian Hartline, who has 4.60 speed.

    He is not the mismatch teams are looking for in a player inside the red zone, but standing at 5'8, Austin's speed and body control will separate him from any other receiver in the draft. With the Miami Dolphins signing the fastest receiver in the NFL in Mike Wallace, having the option to draft potentially the same caliber player in Tavon Austin in the same off season could be epic.



    "Sometimes when I close my eyes, I can't see."
    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    Mudder1310's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2012
    Posts:
    1,687
    vCash:
    7966
    Loc:
    St Helens, Or
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Trade down.
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    AFCMiamiEast's Avatar
    Who pissed in your kool aide?

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2012
    Posts:
    1,728
    vCash:
    1883
    Loc:
    Delray Beach, Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Tannehill 171972 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by Mudder1310 View Post
    Trade down.
    Trade down for who...?
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    273
    vCash:
    1264
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I'd trade down for eifert, trufant, possibly carredine.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    Ruckus45's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2012
    Posts:
    2,854
    vCash:
    14660
    Loc:
    NC
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Cam Wake 91Dolphins Homer
    Wow, Id rather go with neither. Trading up in a deep draft isn't wise. It means you lose out on guys in the 2nd round who are really just about as good on paper as guys in the mid/later first round. Trading down gives you more picks in the 2nd which will give us more opportunities for successful players and hedge our bets. If I had to trade up for either Milliner or Johnson id be equally ok with that.

    Staying put for Tavon Austin is just a fins fan man crush. Im not going to start up all the reasons why Austin is not worth a #12 pick for our team again because I am sure there will be dozens after who will do that also. If we traded down and picked up Austin 20+ so we could address the other positions we need in the 2nd then Id be more ok with him. Other than that, he is a waste of a 12 for the Fins.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    4,399
    vCash:
    8348
    Thanks / No Thanks
    How often have we traded down? How often has it yielded us viable players? How often has it cost us?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mudder1310 View Post
    Trade down.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2007
    Posts:
    7,289
    vCash:
    1096
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Didn't even look, because...


    The option with the most playmakers



    wins games




    PERIOD
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    Mudder1310's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2012
    Posts:
    1,687
    vCash:
    7966
    Loc:
    St Helens, Or
    Thanks / No Thanks
    The options were trade up for 2 specific players or stand for a specific player. None of those are what I'd do. Players from 10-20 are very similar, so I'd trade down and target someone like Eifert, Werner, or Trufant/Rhodes if they were to drop, maybe a WR like Allen. How much our habits in the past have been successful is a completely moot point. Just because you draft a star in one draft doesn't mean anything next draft, same for failure. So what Miami did dropping back in the past doesn't mean anything if they did the same in this one.

    Let's be clear here, there are no standout, superstar quality players in this draft, no Julio Jones, no Joe Thomas, no Matt Stafford. The entire top 10 is good but anyone could go anywhere.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    AFCMiamiEast's Avatar
    Who pissed in your kool aide?

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2012
    Posts:
    1,728
    vCash:
    1883
    Loc:
    Delray Beach, Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Tannehill 171972 Dolphins Logo
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruckus45 View Post
    Wow, Id rather go with neither. Trading up in a deep draft isn't wise. It means you lose out on guys in the 2nd round who are really just about as good on paper as guys in the mid/later first round. Trading down gives you more picks in the 2nd which will give us more opportunities for successful players and hedge our bets. If I had to trade up for either Milliner or Johnson id be equally ok with that.

    Staying put for Tavon Austin is just a fins fan man crush. Im not going to start up all the reasons why Austin is not worth a #12 pick for our team again because I am sure there will be dozens after who will do that also. If we traded down and picked up Austin 20+ so we could address the other positions we need in the 2nd then Id be more ok with him. Other than that, he is a waste of a 12 for the Fins.
    Don't just bash a player without any reasoning behind it. Why is Austin not worth the 12th overall pick?
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    Ruckus45's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2012
    Posts:
    2,854
    vCash:
    14660
    Loc:
    NC
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Cam Wake 91Dolphins Homer
    Austin is not worth the 12 pick TO US because he is undersized, doesnt address any of our needs, and not a consistent 3 down player. Out of a 12 you at very minimum want a guy who plays 3 downs almost every series. At most you want a guy who will start for you for 5 years with a few pro bowl appearances. You also don't address him at 12 TO US because we just resigned Hartline, and signed Gibson and Wallace to address the WR position. We also still have positions of need we tried to resign but didn't get done that can be addressed by guys at 12 who will come in and start 3 downs with a potential for elite status over time.

    This pick isn't about emotion, it's about our needs being met by some really good players at 12. Tavon Austin isn't that guy.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Possible Draft Scenario
    By dolfan4eva in forum NFL Draft Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-27-2010, 01:33 PM
  2. Draft Scenario
    By 3rdandinches in forum NFL Draft Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 11-29-2009, 06:37 PM
  3. Draft scenario
    By CC Coach in forum NFL Draft Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 03-22-2009, 07:53 AM
  4. Draft day scenario? What if...
    By mandal24 in forum NFL Draft Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-23-2009, 11:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •