Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Tannehill with 98.5 QB rating in preseason, 60% comp, 3TD, 0 Int

  1. -1
    catch22's Avatar
    New Mexico Fin Fan

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    699
    vCash:
    178
    Loc:
    New Mexico
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Tannehill with 98.5 QB rating in preseason, 60% comp, 3TD, 0 Int

    Tannehill is probably done taking significant snaps in the pre-season, here are his stats:

    Wk 3 17/27 150 1 td (62% comp, 90 rate) with tons of drops
    Wk 2 10/15: 141 1td (66% comp 119 rate)
    Wk 1: 5/9 75 1td (55% rate 121 rate)
    HOF: 2/5 11 (40% comp 42 rate)

    OVERALL

    34/56 377 3TD 0 INT
    Comp 60.71
    Rate: 98.5
    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    SebasMiamiFan's Avatar
    This Is My House

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    14,287
    vCash:
    5130
    Loc:
    West Palm Beach, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Very solid. He should have had more TDs, but there's clearly a ton of improvement.






    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2012
    Posts:
    613
    vCash:
    3499
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Should have at least five TD's....he has clearly improved from last year...I think a lot of his interceptions this year will come strictly from receivers tipping the ball to the defender because it has happened a lot in pre season.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    SebasMiamiFan's Avatar
    This Is My House

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    14,287
    vCash:
    5130
    Loc:
    West Palm Beach, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Too many drops tonight. Even if he didn't throw a perfect pass, it was catchable.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    Penthos's Avatar
    Am I on speaker phone?

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2002
    Posts:
    4,104
    vCash:
    1876
    Loc:
    Charlotte
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by SebasMiamiFan View Post
    Very solid. He should have had more TDs, but there's clearly a ton of improvement.
    You mean like the one Hartline couldn't hold on to last week?
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    SebasMiamiFan's Avatar
    This Is My House

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    14,287
    vCash:
    5130
    Loc:
    West Palm Beach, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Penthos View Post
    You mean like the one Hartline couldn't hold on to last week?
    Yah even if they weren't perfect passes they were still catchable.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    J. David Wannyheimer's Avatar
    Why did it have to be snakes?

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    12,744
    vCash:
    32773
    Thanks / No Thanks
    1972 Dolphins Logo
    Tannehill had a couple of bad passes in the earlier games that could have been picked, so there's that. But he's also had two good touchdown throws dropped by my count, potentially a third as I thought Clay would have scored on that deep pass down the middle.
    I'm here to tell the truth about top secret Air Force project BAR STOOL. Gamma ray radiation from the particle accelerator under Joe Robbie Stadium is real! Get out while you can! This bad football team is just a front for something far more sinister!
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    Lets get those balls deep!!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    1,962
    vCash:
    3291
    Loc:
    the world
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Hartlines drop wasn't that bad. Gibson's drop tonight was bad.

    Sent from my HTC One V using Tapatalk 4
    "hey atleast I'm housebroken!"
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    finjim's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2004
    Posts:
    4,366
    vCash:
    2388
    Loc:
    Odessa, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Yeah, he's not the answer.



    Quote Originally Posted by WVDolphan View Post
    Watch Mark buttfumble get a starting job somewhere next season and outplay Tannehill.
    Quote Originally Posted by WVDolphan View Post
    buttfumble would take the Bengals to the playoffs guaranteed. He would actually be a good fit for them. I think they could be a legit contender if they signed a good game manager type at QB who can get the ball downfield when the running game is going.
    Quote Originally Posted by WVDolphan View Post
    Sherman is a ****ing beast.
    Quote Originally Posted by WVDolphan View Post
    Jesus. I ALWAYS thought we could win with Tannehill.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    Shouright's Avatar
    FinHeaven Elite

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2004
    Posts:
    15,064
    vCash:
    1543
    Thanks / No Thanks
    His preseason QB rating was 66.9 last year, BTW. Good sign.
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Tannehill has a 98.6 passer rating this preseason
    By moonman in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-25-2013, 09:44 PM
  2. tannehill 75 rating
    By crumpdaddy in forum Gaming Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-21-2012, 08:30 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-21-2012, 02:45 PM
  4. Chad Henne 93.38 QB rating through first 3 preseason games
    By Playmaker76 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 08-28-2011, 11:20 PM
  5. What Rating Would You Give the Fins so Far this Preseason?
    By A&O in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-25-2009, 12:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •