Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44

Thread: The Moral Roots of Liberals and Conservatives

  1. -11
    Buddy's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2004
    Posts:
    4,060
    vCash:
    16577
    Loc:
    Victoria, TX
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Re: The Moral Roots of Liberals and Conservatives

    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post
    I think that is by far the most reasonable way to look at Christianity. And you wouldn't be the first person I've spoken with to see it that way. The issue with the Christian right is that despite the majority feeling the same way you do, it's the extreme minority that's the loudest. You get people like Pat Robertson who come out and despite representing that minority, dub themselves as spokesmen for all Christians, making them all look bad. It's a pity that the media focuses only on the outlandish like that. But hey, people want to see the outlandish, so that's what the media gives them. It's a terrible situation we're in...
    Amen to that! I am glad that my rambling made sense. Great thread so far as it necessitates thought.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -12
    TheWalrus's Avatar
    1/7/14

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2011
    Posts:
    9,567
    vCash:
    40550
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Thanks for posting this, Locke. I've had thoughts along many of these same lines over the years, especially the corrupting influence of "teams" and a theory I've held for many years that religion began as a tool for social order that was successful and was passed on like any other useful physical or social trait. Interesting to see them come out of the mouth of a professional psychologist.



    #freespesh
    Quote Quote  

  3. -13
    cdz12250's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    983
    vCash:
    1532
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by SCall13 View Post
    I had no idea that, for the most part, Liberals even had morals. =)
    Don't mind telling you that in a political environment where the country is suffering because liberals and conservatives don't respect each other, your post was pretty f***ing stupid.
    Quote Quote  

  4. -14
    cdz12250's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    983
    vCash:
    1532
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post
    I should apologize for not describing it correctly, then. Psychologists only really care about the social aspect of things like this. In the end, even the fiscal side comes back to it. Funding for war? Purity/Sanctity. Funding for "entitlements"? Fairness/Reciprocity. I could go on, but they all tie back into the morality aspects he describes.

    As for you being socially liberal, let me ask you a few questions. Obviously you are OK with gays marrying and having the same rights as straights, but are you accepting of their lifestyle, or are you willing to "deal with it"? Same with abortions. Are you stepping back and saying that it's OK for others to get abortions because it's their body despite morally thinking abortions are wrong, or do you truly have no issues with abortions? I ask because I talk to quite a few people who claim to be socially liberal, but are really just willing to let others live their lives. And that's not a bad thing in the slightest. There is a lot to be said about someone who fundamentally disagrees with something, but is willing to let others live their lives as they see fit. But I would still classify those people as socially conservative. They are just good people and are willing to let others live how they want.

    I'm surprised you went into that video expecting it to be crazy and bias. I make it a point not to post anything overly partisan, if it's partisan at all. Especially when delving into something like this, I wouldn't post anything at all unless I was confident it was objective...
    Why not classify them as centrist?
    Quote Quote  

  5. -15
    SCall13's Avatar
    Finheaven QB

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2003
    Posts:
    13,078
    vCash:
    4747
    Loc:
    Charlotte, NC
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post


    I like how I post a thoughtful, scientific, non-partisan discussion of the differences between liberals and conservatives, and the first post is partisan horse ****. How about if the subject matter is too over your head, you just stay out of the thread...?
    Relax man. I was joking. Geez.

    SCall13, Jr.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -16
    SCall13's Avatar
    Finheaven QB

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2003
    Posts:
    13,078
    vCash:
    4747
    Loc:
    Charlotte, NC
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Buddy View Post
    I should have known it wasn't too crazy given that you posted it but I read the comments below the video first and got jaded. I thought they would be slamming religion with the Jesusland stuff. However, it pretty well called out the liberals just as much.

    You would be correct that ultimately, I feel that abortion is morally wrong but that it is not my right to dictate to others how to live their life. I am less sure about homosexuality as I think it is more inherent to one's being and not as much of a pure choice. I think of it as more of a genetic anomaly than a life choice. I think the Bible is pretty clear on abortion but I think the verses often quoted regarding homosexuality being a sin are not interpreted correctly. Thus, I am uncertain as to my ultimate view of morality regarding homosexuality. However, I am crystal clear on my convictions regarding impeding the rights of others and would never support outlawing anything that boils down to personal choice regardless of how I might feel about the issue personally.

    While we are on the subject, let me give you a peek into my brain and heart...you will see why a lot people don't get me, especially the people who think they are a lot like me. God gives us the choice to do whatever we want. We can follow him or not, believe in him or not, act morally or not, or be self-righteous or not. God, in my opinion, would absolutely not condone garnering moral actions through the removal of choices. If he wanted to make immorality impossible or illegal, he would have created us differently. We make choices every second of every day for a variety of reasons and we are ultimately accountable for those choices. Some of those choices will be good, some bad, some moral, some immoral. However, those choices make us who we are and that is the crux of what God loves about us. That is why the religious right is such a train wreck right now as is much of the liberal movement...they are trying to mandate their morality and only ensure the rights applicable to them. I don't jive with that as it violates my personal morality and, in my opinion, God's morality.

    I hope this makes sense to someone other than me as people usually look at me like I have a boob on my head when I have tried to explain my views in the past. Try throwing that one out in Sunday School...it didn't go over too well.

    Really bro? It's pretty clearly stated. There is NO WAY to misinterpret it.

    Leviticus 18:22 - Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination.

    Romans 1:27 - And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind

    Effeminate: (of a man) having or showing characteristics regarded as typical of a woman; unmanly.

    Leviticus 20:13 - If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them.

    Romans 1:26-27 - For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature

    Looks pretty plain and simple to me. Homosexuality is WRONG. There is no way to misinterpret what the bible says. It's honestly plain as day.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -17
    TheWalrus's Avatar
    1/7/14

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2011
    Posts:
    9,567
    vCash:
    40550
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by SCall13 View Post
    Really bro? It's pretty clearly stated. There is NO WAY to misinterpret it.

    Leviticus 18:22 - Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination.

    Romans 1:27 - And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind

    Effeminate: (of a man) having or showing characteristics regarded as typical of a woman; unmanly.

    Leviticus 20:13 - If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them.

    Romans 1:26-27 - For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature

    Looks pretty plain and simple to me. Homosexuality is WRONG. There is no way to misinterpret what the bible says. It's honestly plain as day.
    So is it's irrelevancy.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -18
    Spesh's Avatar
    #freespesh

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    8,455
    vCash:
    1378
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by SCall13 View Post
    Really bro? It's pretty clearly stated. There is NO WAY to misinterpret it.

    Leviticus 18:22 - Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination.

    Romans 1:27 - And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind

    Effeminate: (of a man) having or showing characteristics regarded as typical of a woman; unmanly.

    Leviticus 20:13 - If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them.

    Romans 1:26-27 - For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature

    Looks pretty plain and simple to me. Homosexuality is WRONG. There is no way to misinterpret what the bible says. It's honestly plain as day.
    Matthew 7:1-2
    King James Version (KJV)
    7 Judge not, that ye be not judged.

    2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
    Bible is fun.

    at: no way to misinterpret what the bible says.


    Terrorist attack count against the Anything Goes Thread: 2
    Quote Quote  

  9. -19
    tylerdolphin's Avatar
    More Smug than Birthday Dog

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    12,566
    vCash:
    7005
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Cam Wake 91
    Alright guys lets try not to send this thread off the deep end by getting into religion.




    Quote Quote  

  10. -20
    SCall13's Avatar
    Finheaven QB

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2003
    Posts:
    13,078
    vCash:
    4747
    Loc:
    Charlotte, NC
    Thanks / No Thanks
    If you don't believe in it, then that's your choice. Sorry for you.
    Last edited by rob19; 09-21-2013 at 07:34 PM. Reason: Personal Attack
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. SHOCKING NEWS conservatives give more to charity than liberals
    By Eli_Manning in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-04-2012, 02:49 PM
  2. Liberals and conservatives may have different brains
    By irish fin fan in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-09-2011, 08:28 PM
  3. No really, what is the difference between liberals and conservatives?
    By His'nBeatYour'n in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 09-30-2006, 12:28 AM
  4. Liberals, Conservatives Fight Patriot Act
    By BAMAPHIN 22 in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-25-2005, 05:31 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-10-2003, 09:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •