Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Dynasties... How many were there?

  1. -1
    FINintheMOON's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    4,907
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Catharpin, Va
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Dynasties... How many were there?

    Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?

    How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?

    Props to In Flames for the SICK SIG!
    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    Phin19's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2003
    Posts:
    850
    vCash:
    1026
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by FINintheMOON
    Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?

    How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
    since 1970, these teams have gone to more than three SB in a 10 year span since merger (6)

    Dallas, 1970-1978 (70,71,75,77,78)
    Pittsburgh, 1974-1979 (74,75,78,79)
    Washington 1982-1991 (82,83,87,91)
    San Francisco 1981-1989 (81,84,88,89)
    Buffalo 1990-1993 (90,91,92,93)
    New England 1996-2004 (96,01,03,04)

    I think that`s all of them. I wouldn`t consider Buffalo a dinasty (no titles) but you just said teams that WENT to the SB. the 90`s cowboys are considered a dinasty, but they only went to three SBs

    as for the second question, only two teams have gone to three or more straight SBs and those are Miami, 1971-1973 and Buffalo, 1990-1993.
    failure has many excuses . . . . . . . success has no explanation
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    FinsAreLife's Avatar
    F-A-L

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    4,761
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Rochester, NY
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Phin19
    since 1970, these teams have gone to more than three SB in a 10 year span since merger (6)

    Dallas, 1970-1978 (70,71,75,77,78)
    Pittsburgh, 1974-1979 (74,75,78,79)
    Washington 1982-1991 (82,83,87,91)
    San Francisco 1981-1989 (81,84,88,89)
    Buffalo 1990-1993 (90,91,92,93)
    New England 1996-2004 (96,01,03,04)

    I think that`s all of them. I wouldn`t consider Buffalo a dinasty (no titles) but you just said teams that WENT to the SB. the 90`s cowboys are considered a dinasty, but they only went to three SBs

    as for the second question, only two teams have gone to three or more straight SBs and those are Miami, 1971-1973 and Buffalo, 1990-1993.


    id say youve got it covered there for sure.
    F-A-L
    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2009
    Posts:
    131
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks
    how is buffalo not a dynasty? no other team has done (or in all liklihood will do) what they did.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    TheDon74's Avatar
    42.7% of all statistics are made up

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2009
    Posts:
    2,234
    vCash:
    1648
    Loc:
    Naples, Fla
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Phin19 View Post
    since 1970, these teams have gone to more than three SB in a 10 year span since merger (6)

    Dallas, 1970-1978 (70,71,75,77,78)
    Pittsburgh, 1974-1979 (74,75,78,79)
    Washington 1982-1991 (82,83,87,91)
    San Francisco 1981-1989 (81,84,88,89)
    Buffalo 1990-1993 (90,91,92,93)
    New England 1996-2004 (96,01,03,04)
    I find it odd that you consider the Pats 10 year dynasty from 96-04 instead of 01-07.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    290
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Los Angeles, California
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by mnofdichotomy View Post
    how is buffalo not a dynasty? no other team has done (or in all liklihood will do) what they did.
    No doubt is it impressive, but they were never the best and I think that is very important when considering dynasties.
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    SpaceMountain16's Avatar
    Disgruntled

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2006
    Posts:
    7,290
    vCash:
    1287
    Loc:
    Purgatory
    Thanks / No Thanks
    The Vikings went to four Super Bowls in the 70s.

    69-70 vs. KC (Super Bowl IV)
    73-74 vs. MIA (Super Bowl VIII)
    74-75 vs. PIT (Super Bowl IX)
    76-77 vs. OAK (Super Bowl XI)
    "I told the team 7-9 is mediocre, and mediocrity is not going to be accepted here" - Tony Sparano

    "Well the cool breeze came on Tuesday, And the corn's a bumper crop
    And the fields are full of dancin' Full of singin' and romancin'
    The music never stopped." - Bob Weir

    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    nyjunc's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    27,552
    vCash:
    17484
    Loc:
    New York
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Blog Entries:
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by FINintheMOON View Post
    Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?

    How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
    Going to 3 SBs in a 10 year span is not a dynasty.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    Phin19's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2003
    Posts:
    850
    vCash:
    1026
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDon74 View Post
    I find it odd that you consider the Pats 10 year dynasty from 96-04 instead of 01-07.
    lol I posted that in january 2006, But you're right 01-07 makes a lot more sense today.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    Kadiddlehopper's Avatar
    Charter Member of the Dolphin's Fan Club

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2004
    Posts:
    3,594
    vCash:
    1683
    Loc:
    Sebastian, Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by FINintheMOON View Post
    Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?

    How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
    Don't see anyone mentioning the Dolphins.
    72, lost to Dallas
    73, beat the Vikings
    74, beat the Redskins
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Dynasties Easier in Current Times?
    By SF Dolphin Fan in forum General NFL Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 01:46 PM
  2. SF / NE Dynasties
    By Patriot Ron in forum The Depths of the Sea
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 03-07-2005, 07:55 PM
  3. Dynasties
    By Lukin in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-07-2004, 09:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •