I wonder how much they paid the judges...
I think I am done with elections because its pretty much pointless. All the candidates are bought and serve the interests of their corporate masters, not the people of the United States of America. I might just continue voting third party, but it doesn't really move the needle.
Maybe we can form a kickstarter campaign to buy our own politicians?
Joe Philbin, PowerPoint Guru (Not Head Coach Material)
Philbin ... put it all together in a PowerPoint presentation. Everything about that presentation had to be perfect.
“If any PowerPoint slide had a spelling or grammar mistake, any typo, any scheme error, that was my responsibility, just like a teacher,” Philbin said.
Now, I have a few ideas beyond that, but he money (bribes) they take now are campaign donations, are they not? In my dream world no more...can't use your own money either, just a set public amount for every election.
Basically if campaign finance did not remove lobbyists there is no real reason to even do it, most people know that is the biggest thing wrong with American Politics today. People can argue over semantics all day, I have never said both parties are EXACTLY the same, there are slight differences. For instance, if the republicans tackled hc reform it wouldn't look EXACTLY like Obamacare...it would include tort reform and leave out pre existing conditions. I guess if I were a douche, I would say: see...the parties aren't the same! Except they basically are, and they are inherently corrupt, and we need a big change, and people need to stop cheering for a side like its their favorite football team.
I also have a problem with there even being parties, as a rule those elected are smarter than the general population,and they use the party system to divide us, and stay in power, I see it everyday in every political post in every forum...enough already.
Last edited by phinfan3411; 04-03-2014 at 06:14 AM.
Are you going to make it illegal for ex-Congressmen to take jobs in industries they once had committee oversight over? Many would say that is an abuse of power. Are you going to forbid large companies from encouraging their employees to vote for a particular candidate? Are we going to adopt European-style laws that penalize politicians or media for lying publicly? All of these ideas that people throw around for creating fairness in politics are admirable, but also unworkable and full of loopholes. Given how party-centric voters have become, it is not wise to think that anything would change anyway. Online forums are not a great indicator of true political motivation; there are lifelong Democrats and lifelong Republicans and they pass it on to their children through parenting, community, income, race, and so many other factors. Political behavior is more scientific than people would like to believe, which is why Nate Silver has embarrassed the traditional media narratives in his election forecasting. You will always have a two-party system as long as you have a winner-take-all election system. If a voter wants more than anything to see Hillary Clinton lose in 2016, it is a wasted vote to go Green, Libertarian, or anything else. The most logical solution is to vote for the Republican, even if you disagree with his other views. If we had proportional voting, we could see this change, but since the two-party system needs to vote for it to change, it will never happen. In 2009 I told that SnakeOilSeller guy that Obama would receive over 300 electoral votes in his re-election campaign, and he acted like it was the most ludicrous statement. However, observable political behavior was an obvious indicator of what was going to happen. When citizens vote on 2016, the media will likely try so say it is a referendum on Obama through Hillary Clinton or whatever candidate the Democrats select. In reality, however, it will be an election based on expected financial outcomes versus real output. If things are as good or better than people expect, the Democrat wins. If things are worse than people expect, the Republican wins. The short-term memory of the populace is why they keep electing these people. Voters unhappy with Obama forget that Bush was a terrible President, and voters satisfied with Obama forget that many of the awful things he has done were similar to what the guy they disliked had done. It is not going to change.
"Politics is the Art of Looking for Trouble, Finding it Everywhere, Diagnosing it Incorrectly, and Applying the Wrong Remedies"
Worst ****ing decision to come out of the courts in years. Horrible, just horrible.
"I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally" ~ W.C. Fields
"A criminal is a person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital to form a corporation."
The Evolution of the Tannehill Booster
First Stage: Tannehill is going to be a star in this league.
Second Stage: Tannehill is better than RGIII, Wilson, etc.
Third Stage: Tannehill is better than some other AFC East quarterback except Tom Brady.
Fourth Stage: Tannehill isn't the only problem on the team.
Not even their mothers can tell them apart.
Taking the money out of politics is the only way this nation can survive going forward. I believe a cap would have been a needed regulation to ensure a even playing field.
Our election process is being bought and paid for by the Saudi's, Soros's, and Murdock's of the world.
The bought and paid for elected leaders today are bastardizing the political system and the principles that founded this nation.
Just waiting for the next thing to be outraged about.