One QB has two consecutive seasons with a QB Rating of 100+, 2 playoff appearances, 1 SB title, and is one of the most efficient players at his position.
The other is Ryan Tannehill . . .
is this thread serious?
Everyone always says Wilson had it easy in Seattle, but what about Tannehill playing in a system he has been familiar with for years. He ran the same system in college and the pros, so that would be a clear advantage in my eyes. I would probably take Wilson in the 3rd over Tanny in the 1st if we can turn back the hands of time. Luck would still be my number one choice of a quarterback from that draft. FYI Wilson is also a young QB with a ring, let's not forget his contributions and achievements in his early career. It's people like the OP that fueled guys like Wilson to overcome his size and play hard to earn his stripes.
Give Tannehill the Seahawks D and then we can make a comparison.
Give Tannehill Seahawks Run game and then we can compare.
We are all trying to argue who is a better QB in different situations.
"What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
---------- Post added at 11:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 AM ----------