Not going to give my opinion here, I want to hear from others.
What want to know is what people think about the different approaches to the conventions. The Democrats presented their core people. The speakers at their convention were all very much in line with the core platform of the Democrat Party...pretty much a unified front, no discension. Virtually every speaker agreed 100% with the party platform.
The Republicans presented a very different group. Moderate, even borderline liberal Republicans, a southern Democrat, almost nobody, including the President and VP that was 100% behind the Party line. The President and VP probably cam eclosest, but even they disagree with elements of the official GOP platform.
So what are the opinions? Just marketing on the part of the parties? If so, which is more effective? If it's something more, what is it? Is it an inclination that the Democrats are more unified, and therefore more clear? Does it say that the GOP embraces more diversity of opinion? What do you think?