Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: We Need a Real Iran Policy

  1. -1
    finataxia24's Avatar
    follow me at @moejo31

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    4,290
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    ALABAMA
    Thanks / No Thanks

    We Need a Real Iran Policy

    Has President Bush quietly concluded that the United States can live with a nuclear-armed Iran? If this seems preposterous, recall the president's words at his year-end news conference. Asked about U.S. policy toward Iran, he said: "We're relying upon others, because we've sanctioned ourselves out of influence with Iran . . . in other words, we don't have much leverage with the Iranians right now."

    This bizarre statement obviously does not portend the president's born-again conversion to multilateralism. Rather, it is a false assessment of U.S. influence and a potentially deadly recipe for U.S. acquiescence to a nuclear Iran.



    Consider what's at stake. Oil-rich Iran is arguably the world's most active state sponsor of terrorism. Iran was behind the 1996 bombing of the U.S. military barracks at Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. It is funding anti-Israeli terrorist groups, harboring al Qaeda operatives and meddling in Iraq. Iran clandestinely built a sophisticated uranium enrichment program that the United States and European nations agree is intended to produce nuclear weapons. Iran has missiles capable of delivering such weapons to Iraq, Israel and even parts of Europe.
    President Bush says the greatest threat to U.S. national security is a nuclear weapon in the hands of terrorists. A nuclear Iran, not Saddam Hussein's Iraq, is a truly dangerous manifestation of that threat.

    So how has the Bush administration acted to protect us? Overstretched with 140,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and paralyzed by internal policy disputes, the administration's response has been to posture, threatening to take Iran to the U.N. Security Council, while effectively having no Iran policy at all.

    In response to one of the most urgent threats to the United States, Bush has subcontracted American security to the Europeans. Last week the president confirmed this as his approach, arguing that the United States has no choice. "We've sanctioned ourselves out of influence," the president said, almost echoing Vice President Cheney, who as chief executive of Halliburton pressed for lifting U.S. sanctions against Iran.


    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Dec29.html







    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    Fin_Fanatic's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2004
    Posts:
    888
    vCash:
    1214
    Loc:
    Virginia
    Thanks / No Thanks
    come on lets be real here, even if he did say he was going to destroy iran there would be a HUGE uproar. also there are some political factors in iran that might turn out nicely given some time....
    2011: The Year of the Dolphins
    When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him.
    --Franklin D. Roosevelt
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    Wildbill3's Avatar
    Misery Loves Company

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2001
    Posts:
    25,132
    vCash:
    6640
    Loc:
    Kentucky
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Rebel AllianceSuperman logoXbox LogoPlaystation LogoSnakes!
    you ***** about war everywhere else, now you want a war? sheesh.
    "I didn't feel like we had to score," Tannehill said. "I had the mindset we were going to score."

    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    Dolphan7's Avatar
    Desert Dolphin

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2004
    Posts:
    16,494
    vCash:
    1008
    Loc:
    Tucson, Arizona
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Let's not forget about Isreal. They take orders from no one. You think Isreal will allow nukes in Iran? I don't.

    Players come and go, but I will always be a Miami Dolphins Fan first and foremost.




    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-11-2012, 08:15 PM
  2. Iran: No change in U.S. policy
    By jared81 in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-21-2009, 10:48 AM
  3. Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei Claims Bahrain Is Part of Iran
    By Phinz420 in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-11-2007, 02:46 PM
  4. Israel seeks Iran overflight permission for Iran air strike
    By Celtkin in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-25-2007, 10:52 PM
  5. It's time for real leadership and a change in policy in Iraq.
    By Walking25 in forum Political | War Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-04-2006, 10:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •