Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads. Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Video clip of the TUCK RULE.

  1. -1
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2005
    Posts:
    134
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Video clip of the TUCK RULE.

    Hey guys,

    Can anyone help me out finding another angle of the Woodson hit on Brady in the 2001 playoff game? The only angle i can find is the front view where it looks like Woodson possibly hits Brady in the face. I want to see another angle of the play if anyone has a link for it.


    Thanks for any help.
    Quote Quote  

  2. -2
    Oaklandraider's Avatar
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2005
    Posts:
    425
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    oakland Cali
    Thanks / No Thanks
    That was a damn fumble no doubt about it!!
    Quote Quote  

  3. -3
    Dolfan984's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2001
    Posts:
    9,679
    vCash:
    1258
    Loc:
    Bay Area, California
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Oaklandraider
    That was a damn fumble no doubt about it!!
    Hell yeah it was.


    Quote Quote  

  4. -4
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2005
    Posts:
    134
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Yeah, I know it was a fumble. The problem is that everytime i bring it up to Patriots fans they just shrug it off that Woodson should have been flagged for an illegal hit to the Head.

    There's a small clip i've seen at the front view of the play. You can see Woodson's Arm/Hand hit Brady's Shoulder/Arm/Ball and from the angle it looks like it also hit's his face.

    I was hoping someone had another angle of the play because i think it's possible Woodson didn't hit Brady's face, but from the front view you really can't tell.
    Quote Quote  

  5. -5
    Nappy Roots's Avatar
    Da Dalphins

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2004
    Posts:
    15,138
    vCash:
    1160
    Loc:
    Flawda
    Thanks / No Thanks
    actually it wasnt a fumble. it should of been but it wasnt. by the way the rule was worded, it was not a fumble. it was an incredibly stupid rule, which is why it should of been a fumble. but lets be real, the rule stated it, and it was the correct call.
    Quote Quote  

  6. -6
    Oaklandraider's Avatar
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2005
    Posts:
    425
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    oakland Cali
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Damn refs cost us the game!!
    Quote Quote  

  7. -7
    Roman529's Avatar
    Moon Runner / The 3 AM Crew

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2004
    Posts:
    33,733
    vCash:
    10858
    Loc:
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I cant feel totally sorry for the Raiders and their fans, especially since I was around to see Stabler beat us with one of the luckiest throws in NFL History that cost us a shot at 3 straight superbowl wins.....BUT I do think the Raiders got totally screwed by the refs inthe snow job game. BRADY FUMBLED!!! End of story.
    Quote Quote  

  8. -8
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    18,554
    vCash:
    1000
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by Nappy Roots
    actually it wasnt a fumble. it should of been but it wasnt. by the way the rule was worded, it was not a fumble. it was an incredibly stupid rule, which is why it should of been a fumble. but lets be real, the rule stated it, and it was the correct call.
    :yeahthat:

    If you go by the rule books it wasn't a fumble, when it clearly should have been.
    Quote Quote  

  9. -9
    Wagon Circler's Avatar
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    1,631
    vCash:
    1784
    Loc:
    Gilbert, Arizona (Born in Buffalo)
    Thanks / No Thanks
    the tuck rule is to the raiders, as the music city miracle is to the bills.
    Quote Quote  

  10. -10
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    3,233
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    MI
    Thanks / No Thanks
    that was a fumble i think, but it did fall under the tuck rule.
    Go Dolphins!
    Quote Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. The infamous tuck rule revisted...
    By dolphans1 in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-15-2012, 10:51 PM
  2. f the tuck rule
    By sinPHIN in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-14-2012, 04:24 PM
  3. The Tuck rule: Let's discuss
    By DirkDiggler in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-14-2008, 02:46 AM
  4. How does the tuck rule make any sense?
    By Thebignate5 in forum Beasts of the AFC East
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-24-2006, 09:30 AM
  5. Why does the Tuck Rule still exist?
    By SkapePhin in forum Miami Dolphins Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-05-2005, 11:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •