Also another thing that gets me in this ridiculousness (not your premise of the thread Chad) but stating how penix would be a great fit for the offense with:
“needs a QB who throws on time, quickly from the pocket, with great leverage, accurately and far down the field, and there is a gonna be a guy sitting there that; those are his best attributes in Penix. He's great from the pocket, he manipulates the field, very experianced player with 45 starts and throws with power and leverage"
….. is that not describing Tua to a t pretty much? I mean what
But hey I suppose the idea in of itself isn’t so bad for a thread, just if it’s wise to gamble on a new qb to start over. In our scenario I’d go with no in the current situation
“needs a QB who throws on time, quickly from the pocket, with great leverage, accurately and far down the field, and there is a gonna be a guy sitting there that; those are his best attributes in Penix. He's great from the pocket, he manipulates the field, very experianced player with 45 starts and throws with power and leverage"
….. is that not describing Tua to a t pretty much? I mean what
But hey I suppose the idea in of itself isn’t so bad for a thread, just if it’s wise to gamble on a new qb to start over. In our scenario I’d go with no in the current situation